THE SCIENCE

CRAMZY Focus Science Test (n=50)

Overview

To evaluate CRAMZY’s impact on focus and attention performance more objectively, we conducted a controlled test with 50 participants. Under standardized testing conditions, we collected both:

• Objective performance: reaction time, attention lapses (PVT errors), and distraction resistance
• Subjective experience: participants’ self-rated focus state during the session

The core question was simple: Can CRAMZY help you enter focus faster in distracting environments, maintain steadier attention, and reduce “mind-wandering” moments?

Approach

1) Study design

• Participants: 50 (n=50)
• Comparison: CRAMZY vs placebo
• Testing environment: standardized devices and workflow; tasks administered in a fixed order to reduce environmental noise
• How results are shown: group averages with relative % differences (as displayed above)

2) Why these tasks?

We selected metrics commonly used in attention research that help distinguish “true focus” from short-lived stimulation:

A. PVT (Psychomotor Vigilance Task)

Measures sustained attention and vigilance, especially capturing brief “dropout” moments.

• Reaction Time: lower is better (faster, steadier responses)
• Errors / Lapses: fewer is better (fewer moments of freezing, delayed responses, or missed stimuli)

B. Stroop Interference RT

Measures distraction resistance / attentional control—how well you stay accurate and fast when information conflicts.

• Lower Interference RT: better ability to ignore distractions and return to the task

C. Subjective Focus

Participants rated perceived focus on a 1–10 scale (closer to real-world experience).

Results

Result 1: PVT Reaction Time — 32% faster

• CRAMZY: 220 ms
• Placebo: 320 ms
• Conclusion: 32% faster reaction time

In tasks that demand rapid response and sustained attention, the CRAMZY group performed more cleanly: faster to lock in, quicker to respond, and less sluggish across the session.

Result 2: PVT Errors (Lapses) — 50% fewer

• CRAMZY: 2 lapses
• Placebo: 4 lapses
• Conclusion: 50% fewer lapses

A lapse can be understood as a brief attention dropout—those half-second blank moments where responses slow dramatically or stimuli are missed. Cutting lapses by 50% suggests more stable attention, not just a temporary buzz.

Result 3: Stroop Interference RT — 57% improvement

• CRAMZY: 60 ms
• Placebo: 140 ms
• Conclusion: 57% better (lower is better)

The Stroop task tests control under conflict and distraction. A 57% improvement indicates the CRAMZY group filtered noise faster, returned to the task more quickly, and kept momentum with fewer derailments.

Result 4: Subjective Focus — 70% higher rating

• CRAMZY: 8.5 / 10
• Placebo: 5 / 10
• Conclusion: 70% higher perceived focus

This answers the most practical question: Do you actually feel focused—and can you keep going? Moving from 5 to 8.5 typically matches lower start friction, less task-switching, and a cleaner, more controllable focus state.

Interpretation

Taken together, the four outcomes point to one consistent signal:

1. Faster: shorter reaction time (220ms vs 320ms)
2. Steadier: fewer attention dropouts (2 vs 4 lapses)
3. More distraction-resistant: stronger control under interference (60ms vs 140ms)
4. More noticeable: higher subjective focus (8.5 vs 5)

Notes

• Results shown are group averages under standardized test conditions and reported as relative differences.
• Individual experiences may vary based on sleep, caffeine habits, stress, diet, and day-to-day baseline.
• CRAMZY is a dietary supplement intended to support focus and cognitive performance. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

† These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.